The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.
The proposed cuts would place a 15% indirect cost rate on all new and existing grant awards received by research institutions and universities.
For most countries around the world, sourcing energy entirely from wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower by 2050 would ...
Over the past few weeks, the Trump administration has introduced sweeping changes across the federal government that have impacted the federal ...
Calling the cuts "arbitrary and capricious," 22 states sued the Trump administration Feb. 10 – the day they were set to take effect – with lawsuits following from the Associat ...
The state's life sciences industry, which generated $3.3 billion in economic activity in 2023, could be severely impacted by ...
In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard — from the Harvard School of Public ...
Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...
The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.
The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...
On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback