Efforts to curtail federal health funding will hamper the ability of the science community to do groundbreaking research, ...
U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand was in Rochester on Friday, and joined local university leaders on their push for President ...
The president held a controversial joint press conference with the Tesla CEO — his most powerful adviser. And experts think ...
The ripple effects of this hasty, shortsighted cost-cutting policy threaten medical progress, the United States' scientific superpower status and state economies like Minnesota’ s, which are reliant ...
As many as 1,300 probationary employees at CDC and 1,500 at NIH are losing their jobs. Many fear for the future of public health and scientific research.
In a visit to UB, the lawmakers said cutting indirect cost reimbursement for grants would negatively impact livesaving ...
The proposed cuts would place a 15% indirect cost rate on all new and existing grant awards received by research institutions and universities.
Over the past few weeks, the Trump administration has introduced sweeping changes across the federal government that have impacted the federal ...
Opinion
1don MSNOpinion
The NIH has had its missteps — opaque grant review processes, funding imbalances and institutional inertia. But this is not reform.
After the National Institutes of Health issued an order Friday night that would dramatically reduce funding, professor ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results