Earlier this month, the National Institutes of Health announced that it would limit the amount of funding for indirect costs related to research to 15 percent. Indirect costs cover items such as ...
Federal funding for medical research has dropped by roughly $1 billion this year, raising alarm among universities, medical ...
A ruling by a federal judge in Boston has paused the battle over National Institutes of Health funding, benefiting ...
With federal support, universities produce world-changing discoveries and the next generation of exquisitely well-trained ...
The NIH says funding cuts would save it billions of dollars a year. D.C.-area industry and academic leaders say it would cripple R&D.
The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.
Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.
Decades of NIH-funded research has led to high impact medical advances, including immunotherapies used to treat a wide ...
U.S. Sen. Jack Reed on Friday hosted a press conference at Butler Hospital in Providence to highlight what he called unlawful ...
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has proposed drastic cuts to indirect funding for research grants, impacting major ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback