News
The Trump administration’s actions on NIH gain-of-function research have raised concerns among scientists, who argue the move could block experiments that are safe and potentially lead to new ...
Agency staffers were told to nominate replacements who were aligned with the priorities of the Trump administration, ...
The National Institutes of Health is upending the panels that make decisions about which grant applications to fund, Nature ...
The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.
The Trump administration’s broadsides against scientific research have caused unprecedented upheaval at the National Cancer ...
NIH has made no progress in narrowing the funding gap created by the freeze on grant approvals despite resuming grant review meetings ...
Empty offices and desks within the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy serve as visible evidence of the impact of cuts to federal research grants.
National Institutes of Health grant terminations have hit some states dramatically harder than others, with just three accounting for more than two-thirds of all rescinded funding this year ...
NIH grant cuts in North Carolina for race, gender, and LGBTQ issues voided by federal judge as UNC, Duke, and Wake Forest researchers await funding resolution ...
A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination.
Judge rules some NIH grant cuts illegal, saying he’s never seen such discrimination in 40 years The judge said the case raises serious questions about racial discrimination by the government.
A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results