This is seismic,” said Dr. Colin Duckett, vice dean for basic and preclinical science at the Duke University School of ...

In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard — from the Harvard School of Public ...

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...

Until you’re wheeled into an ER, relying on a medical system built by decades of taxpayer-funded research. What happens next — the drugs you’re given, the treatments available, the standards of care ...

Cuts to administrative costs associated with NIH grants could jeopardize the economic well-being of cities dependent on ...

Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...

"Without careful consideration of the impact of these changes, we risk long-term damage" to medical research, writes Dr. George Weiner.

The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...

It costs money to maintain the various facilities, utilities and personnel that allow scientists to conduct research in the ...

The administration announced late last week a new cap that would cut billions of research cost funding provided by the ...

Over 20 states are suing the Trump administration over planned cuts to funding at medical and public health research institutions nationwide. The coalition of 22 state attorneys general is challenging ...

Stanford University faces a $160 million annual funding cut as the NIH reduces indirect cost allocations from 26% to 15%, ...