It's about long-term economic resilience in a warming world. Researchers warn of 'indirect' impacts of devastating natural disasters: 'Might not be immediately visible' first appeared on The Cool Down ...

The new model comes as universities brace for a proposed 15-percent limit on indirect costs that would cost them billions of ...

That doesn’t mean that 59% of NSF grants awarded to MIT scientists go toward the university’s indirect costs. Rather, the rate is part of a bigger calculation that’s used to determine how ...

Harvard’s indirect cost rate — the percent of federal funding that covers administrative costs of research — is currently 69 percent, the largest of any Ivy League school.

One size fits none Among institutions receiving NIH funding, indirect-costs rates differ and vary widely—from about 20% to over 75%. These rates are negotiated with the federal government and are ...

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

Ruling suggests plaintiffs are likely to succeed in overturning 15 percent cap on indirect costs.

Where some grants to MSU have included indirect costs equating to over 50% of the grant's direct costs, the NIH has now sought to cap indirect costs on grants at 15%.

Aaron J. Kowalski, Ph.D., CEO of Breakthrough T1D, spoke with Managed Healthcare Executive, about the possible impacts of the NIH’s cuts to indirect research funding.

On February 7, the NIH announced a 15 percent cap on indirect costs—an allowance that previously has averaged about 30 percent across the nation. For UNC, it meant a 40 percent research funding cut.

By definition, indirect costs can’t directly be tied to research breakthroughs. To put it mildly, some beneficiaries of NIH grants are tone deaf when it comes to their own operational inefficiency.