A review of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which held that federal district courts’ universal ...

Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. It ...

This is part of SCOTUSblog’s term in review series, in which scholars analyze some of the most significant cases of the ...

The modern problem of stopping Trump’s executive overreach requires 21st-century solutions. Instead, the Supreme Court handcuffed America to its past.

Class actions and Administrative Procedure Act claims can achieve much the same result as the nationwide orders that the ...

In the citizenship case, the justices voted 6-3, with the liberals in dissent, to limit the lower-courts’ preliminary ...

In rejecting the concept of the universal injunction, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the proper role of the federal courts ...

Justice Barrett writes for the Court's majority that universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable power of federal courts.

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

According to the decision, the woman’s tenancy at the multi-level social housing complex began in 2020. The trust, which ...

JURIST Staff, US JULIANA V. UNITED STATES: CASE ANALYIS Climate change is the biggest problem of our time. It is a problem spanning generations and across continents, ...

Trump's challenge to universal injunctions in the Supreme Court could redefine judicial authority and influence the future of ...