Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...
While the economic pain may not be as deeply felt as it might be at UAB and in Birmingham, NIH cuts will hurt UA and ...
Cuts to administrative costs associated with NIH grants could jeopardize the economic well-being of cities dependent on ...
Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...
Opinion
1don MSNOpinion
People often see this as administrative bloat. It is a reimbursement for costs already incurred by universities to support the research infrastructure at the university. And people don’t necessarily ...
The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...
Alabama economists and politicians worry that Trump’s budget slashing could send harmful economic ripples across a state that ...
As the body of research expands on the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists to address various health ...
The Trump administration's cuts to medical research funding could force Brown University to stop many research projects and cut more than 200 RI jobs.
The University of Rochester will confront significant blows to groundbreaking clinical studies, UR says in a legal challenge ...
The Trump administration’s decision to cap how much NIH will pay for indirect costs on university research grants would cost ...
Here’s how big a hit some universities may take if NIH slashes support for indirect research costs
Documents analyzed by STAT show that big losers under the NIH's cuts to biomedical research include Stanford, Vanderbilt, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback