President Trump wants an alternative to the World Health Organization: how should we respond?
Much attention has rightly been placed on how to fill the World Health Organization’s funding gap if and when the US withdraws. Kent Buse and colleagues argue that President Trump’s idea to establish a parallel structure is equally insidious as withdrawing from WHO Some things are much better done together,
More than half of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from its membership in the WHO. As of April 2024, 25% of U.S. adults say the country benefits a great deal from its membership, while about one ...
Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been told to halt all communication with the World Health ...
The World Health Organization is shaped by its members: 194 countries that set health priorities and make agreements about ...
World Health Organization officials declared the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak -- later to be dubbed COVID-19 -- a public ...
If the U.S. withdraws funding and support from WHO, critical programs that support the survival of women and children will be at risk.
This week the World Health Organization (WHO) released new guidelines recommending people switch the regular salt they use at ...
NEW YORK — President Donald Trump is pulling the U.S. out of the World Health Organization for a second time, the White House announced late Monday. The day-one executive order fulfills Trump ...
16h
Health and humanitarian groups around the world were still uncertain on Wednesday if and how they could resume work after the ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback