The Trump administration has targeted $4 billion in cuts to “indirect” costs for NIH research grants. Those funds, typically known as overhead, help cover the facilities ...

While some argue that trimming these costs is a reasonable measure since some for nonprofit funders like the Carnegie ...

"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...

Biomedical research in the U.S. is world-class in part because of a long-standing partnership between universities and the ...

Potential delays in clinical trials may result in extended timelines for new drug approvals, and a sudden reduction in ...

Over the past few weeks, the Trump administration has introduced sweeping changes across the federal government that have impacted the federal ...

Calling the cuts "arbitrary and capricious," 22 states sued the Trump administration Feb. 10 – the day they were set to take effect – with lawsuits following from the Associat ...

The impact will be crippling to biomedical research in the U.S., and institutions will immediately face hard choices about ...

In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard said limits on indirect cost ...

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

University officials await clarity on federal funding supporting equipment and facilities used by faculty, students and ...