Layoffs, funding freezes, and executive orders spark outcry among federal researchers and university partners, fearing that science itself is under siege.

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

The NIH projected the cut will save it $4 billion during the current federal fiscal year, which ends September 30. That’s nearly half of the $9 billion that the NIH said it set aside for overhead ...

Here's a look at what the aftermath of Trump's directive to pause federal financial assistance has meant, and could mean, for ...

An audit released earlier this month by the National Science Foundation’s Office of the Inspector General uncovered notable ...

Inside a sprawling lab at the University of New England's Portland campus, scientists conduct research that could eventually ...

Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...

A 2025 change in NIH funding parameters has higher education leaders concerned. However, a judge has blocked the NIH funding ...

The state's life sciences industry, which generated $3.3 billion in economic activity in 2023, could be severely impacted by ...

In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard said limits on indirect cost ...

The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...