On May 5, Cornell sued the National Science Foundation (NSF) over a 15% cap on recovery of indirect costs associated with its research grants. This follows two earlier lawsuits on the same issue ...

The new model comes as universities brace for a proposed 15-percent limit on indirect costs that would cost them billions of ...

Greece stands out in the EU for its heavy reliance on indirect taxes, a trend that disproportionately impacts lower-income ...

The deluge in Texas last week ranks as one of the deadliest and costliest flash floods in US history, highlighting the ...

Explore the real-world economic impact of wolf recovery on U.S. ranchers. A University of Arizona study reveals how even ...

Objective This study aimed to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalisation costs and its associated factors on Nepalese households during the second wave of the pandemic, within the ...

Compared with peers, CIB has better room to lower its funding costs by replacing high-cost interbank funding with retail deposits at a lower cost.

These rates were included in Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreements (“NICRAs”), binding upon the institution and the agency, and applied against the Modified Total Direct Costs (“MTDC ...

The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced that it will cap the reimbursement of facility and administrative (F&A) costs—also known as indirect costs—at 15% for all new grants ...

The calculator estimates that the new and reciprocal proposed tariffs will cost the global economy more than $4.7 trillion in direct and indirect costs.

After DOE capped indirect costs at 15 percent of funding, Princeton and seven research universities filed a lawsuit against the DOE and its secretary.

“A cut to the reimbursement of necessary research costs is a cut to research, plain and simple,” writes Barbara R. Snyder, president of the Association of American Universities.