The Trump administration is rapidly canceling hundreds of grants, in the most aggressive attack yet on American science.

Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...

The new policy rolled out by the NIH capped the indirect costs for all institutions at a fixed rate of 15%. In 2023, NIH ...

Alzheimer’s research requires studies that can last for decades, said Dr. Thomas Grabowski, the center’s director and a professor of radiology and neurology at the UW School of Medicine. Those studies ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) unveiled a plan March 6 to move the peer review of grant applications, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts to a central location ...

President Donald Trump's pick to be the next Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, spent much of his confirmation hearing Wednesday defending the president's ...

But senior officials were grappling with a jaw-dropping memo from Trump’s Office of Management and Budget that called for a pause on federal grant activity — one of NIH’s main reasons to exist.

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...

Thus, it came as a shock to these institutions when the NIH, based on a new Trump administration policy, announced Feb. 7, that it intends to cut the funding used to support the grantee ...

On March 5, a U.S. district judge in Boston issued a nationwide injunction blocking the administration from implementing the proposed cuts to NIH funding, arguing that the planned cuts were unlawful.