Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...

We are risking an entire generation of medical professionals, researchers, and scientists … and it's a future disaster ...

Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...

Washington University-led research shows a small group of participants in an Alzheimer’s study experienced a significant ...

Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...

Some of the terminated grants focused on boosting uptake in minority populations, with the cuts covering a range of vaccines.

Donald Trump betrayed his ignorance of scientific research during his joint address to Congress on March 4. In an attempt to ...

What this means in practice isn’t yet clear, but The Wall Street Journal has reported that he might try to prioritize funding ...

Following peer review, applications are passed to the NIH’s funding institutes and centers, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) or the National Cancer Institute ...

The Trump administration’s proposed cap on NIH indirect cost reimbursements would result in an annual loss of more than $150 ...