Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...

Following peer review, applications are passed to the NIH’s funding institutes and centers, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) or the National Cancer Institute ...

By blocking announcements in the Federal Register, the administration is keeping experts from meeting to evaluate funding ...

Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...

Hoskins, whose main research grant runs out on 30 April, received a favourable score on a grant renewal at an NIH study section in October, only to find out earlier this year that the February ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...

According to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...

She says the region stands to take a significant economic hit, with scores of jobs potentially ... life-saving research," DeLuzio said. For now, a federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's ...

Stand Up for Science, a volunteer-based operation designed to protest perceived threats to scientific research and funding, ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, ...

The NIH traditionally follows a painstaking process for considering and awarding research grants ... each often 200 pages long — and score them. The best ones then proceed to another round ...