The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.

The National Institutes of Health is upending the panels that make decisions about which grant applications to fund, Nature ...

So far in 2025, the Trump administration has cut more than $1 billion in NIH grants. That includes a study on sickle cell ...

Federal rulings pausing NIH grant cuts highlight an unprecedented, adversarial shift in U.S. research funding, leaving academic medicine institutions wary of deeper rifts. In June, federal judges ...

Agency staffers were told to nominate replacements who were aligned with the priorities of the Trump administration, ...

NIH has made no progress in narrowing the funding gap created by the freeze on grant approvals despite resuming grant review meetings ...

National Institutes of Health grant terminations have hit some states dramatically harder than others, with just three accounting for more than two-thirds of all rescinded funding this year ...

In a historic move, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced today that it will no longer seek research ...

NIH halts grant terminations ‘effective immediately,’ email says Federal judge directed agency last week to reinstate funding for about 900 projects Adobe By Anil Oza June 25, 2025 ...

A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination.

In a confusing turn of events, the National Institutes of Health told staff that it would free up some frozen funding to the Ivy League campus — then quickly backtracked.

Empty offices and desks within the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy serve as visible evidence of the impact of cuts to federal research grants.