The Trump administration is rapidly canceling hundreds of grants, in the most aggressive attack yet on American science.

According to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...

Funding for new grants also slowed to a trickle after the NIH halted grant application review meetings in January. At Duke, ...

Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...

While federal judges tried to halt the funding freeze, in some cases the Trump administration did not comply with their ...

Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...

Looking to shave $65 million from its annual expenditures while streamlining the first stage of its two-level grant review process, the U.S. NIH is proposing to centralize the peer review of all ...

The National Institutes of Health unveiled a plan on March 6 to move the peer review of grant applications, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts to a central location at the ...

Following peer review, applications are passed to the NIH’s funding institutes and centers, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) or the National Cancer Institute ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...