Feb. 7, U.S. President Donald J. Trump announced federal research funding cuts for the National Institute of Health. The ...

Fred Hutch Cancer Center oncologist Dr. Peter Nelson, left, explains his lab's research to Congresswoman Suzan DelBene as Dr.

Earlier this month, the National Institutes of Health announced that it would limit the amount of funding for indirect costs related to research to 15 percent. Indirect costs cover items such as ...

A few weeks after Donald Trump’s re-election, I found myself talking to an old friend at a higher-education conference ...

A ruling by a federal judge in Boston has paused the battle over National Institutes of Health funding, benefiting ...

Citrus is a perishable product with a limited shelf life, so it is especially vulnerable to the impact of delays ...

Aaron J. Kowalski, Ph.D., CEO of Breakthrough T1D, spoke with Managed Healthcare Executive, talks about the possible impacts ...

With federal support, universities produce world-changing discoveries and the next generation of exquisitely well-trained ...

The NIH says funding cuts would save it billions of dollars a year. D.C.-area industry and academic leaders say it would cripple R&D.

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser challenges Trump's executive orders on medical research funding, federal worker buyouts ...