The National Institutes of Health announced on Friday that it would be capping a type of funding for medical research at hospitals, universities, medical schools and other scientific institutions in ...

The NIH said capping indirect cost payments will save billions of dollars. Universities said it will disrupt vital, life-saving research.

A federal judge in Massachusetts has granted two temporary restraining orders blocking the recent decision by the US National ...

Louisiana universities could lose tens of millions of dollars in federal funding under a proposed slash in National ...

Yale scientists warn that sweeping federal cuts to indirect costs could destabilize research funding, force institutional ...

The ruling temporarily halts a policy slashing research overhead costs in 22 states, which filed a lawsuit against the ...

Michigan is suing the National Institutes of Health over changes to NIH’s grant policy.The new guidance, which took effect ...

The second reason indirect costs are not fun to discuss is it is ... Researchers might assume that fewer dollars dedicated to F&A will somehow mean more money in direct research funds, but this ...

What do National Institutes of Health funding cuts mean for universities? We ask Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the journal ...

Missouri universities and research organizations will need to cut about $100 million from administrative costs for research ...

People often see this as administrative bloat. It is a reimbursement for costs already incurred by universities to support the research infrastructure at the university. And people don’t necessarily ...

These items are not included as indirect costs, but it could still mean a large loss in revenue for St. Jude. Over the past five years, St. Jude has annually received over $100 million from the NIH.