With federal support, universities produce world-changing discoveries and the next generation of exquisitely well-trained ...

While some argue that trimming these costs is a reasonable measure since some for nonprofit funders like the Carnegie ...

"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...

Biomedical research in the U.S. is world-class in part because of a long-standing partnership between universities and the ...

N.Y., decried the cuts as illegal and rooted in a willful misunderstanding of how medical research is conducted at ...

Over the past few weeks, the Trump administration has introduced sweeping changes across the federal government that have impacted the federal ...

Calling the cuts "arbitrary and capricious," 22 states sued the Trump administration Feb. 10 – the day they were set to take effect – with lawsuits following from the Associat ...

The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Director issued a policy change notice Feb. 7, announcing that the standard rate of indirect costs would be 15% for all current and future grants. The ...

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...

"Without careful consideration of the impact of these changes, we risk long-term damage" to medical research, writes Dr. George Weiner.

Scientists are worried about the future of the nation’s health if these cuts, now being challenged in court, are enacted.