A few weeks after Donald Trump’s re-election, I found myself talking to an old friend at a higher-education conference ...

The NIH says funding cuts would save it billions of dollars a year. D.C.-area industry and academic leaders say it would cripple R&D.

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

UT medical researchers have found the future of their research uncertain after new guidance from the National Institutes of Health implemented under the Trump administration attempts to reduce funding ...

Cuts aimed at the National Institutes of Health in a Feb. 7 announcement from President Donald Trump could have stark impacts ...

Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...

While some argue that trimming these costs is a reasonable measure since some for nonprofit funders like the Carnegie ...

On Friday, February 7, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) issued Policy Statement Supplemental Guidance affecting budgets both for ...

Jon Audhya, a professor and senior assistant dean, says the proposed cuts would essentially halt his work searching for a ...

For fiscal year 2023, NIH spent more than $35 billion in about 50,000 grants to more than 300,000 researchers at more than ...

This is seismic,” said Dr. Colin Duckett, vice dean for basic and preclinical science at the Duke University School of ...

Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...