The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.
In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard — from the Harvard School of Public ...
Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...
Cuts to administrative costs associated with NIH grants could jeopardize the economic well-being of cities dependent on ...
Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...
The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...
Alabama economists and politicians worry that Trump’s budget slashing could send harmful economic ripples across a state that ...
The risk of catastrophic wildfires is increasing. Rising global temperatures, changing precipitation and wind patterns, and ...
Washington has joined 21 states in a lawsuit against the National Institute of Health after the agency announced it would cut ...
The Michigan AG's Office sued over a policy change that cuts reimbursements to universities for overhead costs related to ...
Documents analyzed by STAT show that big losers under the NIH's cuts to biomedical research include Stanford, Vanderbilt, ...
On Friday, the National Institutes of Health announced major cuts to funding of indirect costs for Universities, etc. Here's ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results