The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

At stake is tens of millions of dollars in NIH funding for researchers and institutions across the Charlotte metro region. Since fiscal year 2015, area organizations received $108 million from the NIH ...

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard — from the Harvard School of Public ...

Changes to a key funding formula will reduce research grants at hospitals and universities by billions — and may discourage ...

While the economic pain may not be as deeply felt as it might be at UAB and in Birmingham, NIH cuts will hurt UA and ...

Cuts to administrative costs associated with NIH grants could jeopardize the economic well-being of cities dependent on ...

Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...

Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...

The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...

On Friday afternoon, the National Institute of Health (NIH) announced a $4 billion research funding cut spearheaded by the Trump administration. A federal judge temporarily paused the cut nationally ...