It's about long-term economic resilience in a warming world. Researchers warn of 'indirect' impacts of devastating natural disasters: 'Might not be immediately visible' first appeared on The Cool Down ...

Ten groups representing universities, medical centers, and others have wrapped up an alternative to the Trump administration's plan to cut billions of dollars in research overhead payments.

The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced that it will cap the reimbursement of facility and administrative (F&A) costs—also known as indirect costs—at 15% for all new grants ...

The calculator estimates that the new and reciprocal proposed tariffs will cost the global economy more than $4.7 trillion in direct and indirect costs.

Harvard’s indirect cost rate — the percent of federal funding that covers administrative costs of research — is currently 69 percent, the largest of any Ivy League school.

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

Further, the consistent treatment of costs as either direct or indirect, but not both, is a key factor regarding the adequacy of an organization’s accounting system.

Ruling suggests plaintiffs are likely to succeed in overturning 15 percent cap on indirect costs.

NIH’s 15% Indirect Cost Cap Could Cripple Research, Scientists Say Scientists warn that the NIH’s 15% indirect costs cap could threaten research funding and stall biomedical innovation.

Indirect costs are “difficult for NIH to oversee” because they aren’t entirely entailed by a specific grant. “Private foundations” cap overhead charges at 10 to 15 percent of direct costs and all but ...

Unlike direct costs, which cover salaries, supplies and experiments, indirect costs support the overall research environment, ensuring that scientists have the necessary resources to conduct their ...