The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...

In a move that has woken the biomedical research community, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced on Friday, ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

On February 7, the NIH announced that it would begin capping indirect cost payments for new and existing research grants at 15%.

Now is the time to defend the research partnership that has done so much for our nation and the world, and that can do even ...

Here’s the full list. He then identified the indirect and direct costs NIH reported for each grant. After eliminating very small grants and those with no indirect costs, he computed adjusted ...

Of that amount, about $26 billion went to direct costs for research, while $9 billion was allocated to overhead through NIH’s indirect cost rate. As a justification for the decision, NIH pointed ...

The National Institutes of Health announced on Friday that it would be capping a type of funding for medical research at ...

Many of the nation’s most elite research universities receive 50% or more in addition to direct research expenses to cover indirect costs. Going forward, the rate of support will now be 15% for ...

It is accordingly vital to ensure that as many funds as possible go towards direct scientific research costs rather than administrative overhead,” OPERA wrote in its guidance. The agency also ...

While many scientists are funded through direct grants, the staff members who manage labs, maintain facilities and oversee regulatory compliance are typically financed through indirect cost funding.

“Of this funding, approximately $26 billion went to direct costs for research, while $9 billion was allocated to overhead through NIH’s indirect cost rate.” The agency said the move would ...