The concerns have grown amidst sweeping layoffs at federal health agencies, a lag in research funding and efforts by the NIH ...

The National Institutes of Health updated policies to establish a 15% cap on how much the agency will provide for indirect ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...

N.Y., decried the cuts as illegal and rooted in a willful misunderstanding of how medical research is conducted at ...

Potential delays in clinical trials may result in extended timelines for new drug approvals, and a sudden reduction in ...

Calling the cuts "arbitrary and capricious," 22 states sued the Trump administration Feb. 10 – the day they were set to take effect – with lawsuits following from the Associat ...

Of course the effects will vary across research institutions, as institutions differ markedly in their operating models and ...

NIH grants have supported the direct costs of my own scientific research on developing treatments for conditions ranging from ...

Researchers have been "making great inroads" in precision medicine, and a 15 percent cap on indirect costs could quash the ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest single source of health care research funding in the U.S. The Trump ...

Scientists are worried about the future of the nation’s health if these cuts, now being challenged in court, are enacted.