The new model comes as universities brace for a proposed 15-percent limit on indirect costs that would cost them billions of ...

Ten groups representing universities, medical centers, and others have wrapped up an alternative to the Trump administration's plan to cut billions of dollars in research overhead payments.

Greece stands out in the EU for its heavy reliance on indirect taxes, a trend that disproportionately impacts lower-income ...

The National Institutes of Health announced major reductions to indirect costs for research funding Feb. 7 in a move many experts say would cause serious harm to lifesaving medical ...

Explore the real-world economic impact of wolf recovery on U.S. ranchers. A University of Arizona study reveals how even ...

According to an analysis by Brown University’s Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs, US-led wars since 2001 directly caused the deaths of about 940,000 people across Afghanistan, ...

But why draw a distinction between direct and indirect costs in the first place? Wouldn’t it be easier to just build everything into a single, overall cost? “The reason for distinguishing direct from ...

Further, the consistent treatment of costs as either direct or indirect, but not both, is a key factor regarding the adequacy of an organization’s accounting system.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued guidance capping the “indirect costs” of all NIH grants at 15%. Universities such as Stanford, University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard have been ...

Indirect costs may sound like euphemism for waste — but that couldn’t be further from the truth. Indirect costs like the costs of research facilities are no less real than direct ones.

What do National Institutes of Health funding cuts mean for universities? We ask Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the journal Science and former University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill chancellor.