The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.

The National Institutes of Health is upending the panels that make decisions about which grant applications to fund, Nature ...

BETHESDA, Md. -- People will suffer and die if NIH funding is cut, speakers said Saturday at a rally here in front of the NIH campus. "All of you here understand that when you cut off funding for ...

All requests for NIH grants go through an intensive review process. That process keeps NIH funding flowing to more than 300,000 researchers at more than 2,500 universities, medical schools and ...

Months after the National Institutes of Health paused key grant-review meetings that are required to approve funding, those meetings are now steadily getting back on track.. As STAT reported last week ...

The awards are fundamentally indistinguishable from those offered through the standard F31 program, said a grant reviewer who requested anonymity for fear of professional repercussion.

The CSR uses about 0.3% of the NIH budget to review more than 66,000 applications, the agency said, while ICs cost about 300% more than the CSR to review grants.

Key NIH grant review panels resume meeting, but are not ‘back to normal’ First advisory council meetings, held this week, were abbreviated Manage alerts for this article ...

Reviewers would no longer score researchers’ expertise and institutions during grant evaluations for the US biomedical agency.

The freeze sent shock waves through universities, hospitals, medical schools and other institutions that depend on NIH funding. All requests for NIH grants go through an intensive review process. That ...