News
The temporary order blocks the Department of Defense's 15% cap on research funding that MIT says would result in a $21 ...
Indirect costs are fat targets for budget slashers, but beware: They make science possible. They don't pay for the ...
The National Institutes of Health announced that the agency is making cuts to grants that support research institutions by ...
Two new models are geared toward creating a more transparent and accountable system to track costs indirectly related to ...
The US National Institutes of Health is lowering the maximum “indirect cost rate” that research institutions can charge the government, the agency said late Friday – a move that scientists ...
Johns Hopkins University and the University of Maryland, College Park are fighting to protect millions of dollars in federal ...
After two decades of work in biomedical research policy, there is no topic Carrie Wolinetz hates talking about more than indirect costs. She’s addressing them now because they are crucial.
The indirect cost rate is defined as a percentage of the direct costs of a research project that the funder pays the university in addition to the direct costs.
Indirect research costs are complicated, wonky — and crucial to science. Direct costs include what you might expect — expenses such as the test tubes, beakers, chemicals, biological materials ...
Two months after the National Institutes of Health unilaterally capped indirect research cost reimbursement rates at 15 percent—which a federal judge has permanently blocked—the Department of Energy ...
NIH announces it's slashing funding for indirect research costs The agency estimated that it could save $4 billion by capping indirect costs at 15%. The entrance to the NIH campus in Bethesda, Md ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results