Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing chaos at the agency is fueling a degree of skepticism.

The National Institutes of Health unveiled a plan on March 6 to move the peer review of grant applications, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts to a central location at the ...

Applying for grant funding is a fundamental part of a researcher's career. However, data from UKRI (2021–2022) indicate that ...

Baylor College of Medicine's uncertainty over health research funding is prompting the school to scale back research and ...

Kennedy Jr. The breakdown in the grant review process seemed to reflect a broader Trump administration strategy of exploiting loopholes to effectively keep much of the president’s blanket ...

Following peer review, applications are passed to the NIH’s funding institutes and centers, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) or the National Cancer Institute ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...

UNC received 1,053 grants from the NIH last year, combining for more than $531 million. Duke University got $580 million in agency grants in 2024. Together, the two schools accounted for over half the ...

The initiative follows a structured timeline, with applications for community reviewers opening in December, training sessions held in March, and the grant review process wrapping up by the end of ...

The Trump administration is using a loophole to block the U.S. National Institutes of Health process for issuing new research grants.