I think that this only works if you raise and then catch the exception, but not if you try getting the traceback before raising an exception object that you create, which you might want to do in some designs.
try { WebId = new Guid(queryString["web"]); } catch (FormatException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } catch (OverflowException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } Is there a way to catch both exceptions and only set WebId = Guid.Empty once? The given example is rather simple, as it's only a GUID, but imagine code where you modify an object multiple times, and if one of the manipulations fails as expected, you ...
I'm writing a shell script and need to check that a terminal app has been installed. I want to use a TRY/CATCH command to do this unless there is a neater way.
If you re-throw an exception within the catch block, and that exception is caught inside of another catch block, everything executes according to the documentation.
22 If there is a hierarchy of exceptions you can use the base class to catch all subclasses of exceptions. In the degenerate case you can catch all Java exceptions with:
71 Best practice is that exception handling should never hide issues. This means that try-catch blocks should be extremely rare. There are 3 circumstances where using a try-catch makes sense. Always deal with known exceptions as low-down as you can. However, if you're expecting an exception it's usually better practice to test for it first.
I am trying to write an MS sql script that has a transaction and a try/catch block. If it catches an exception, the transaction is rolled back. If not, the transaction is committed. I have seen ...
